|
f_the_right_wing
|
read my profile
sign my guestbook
Name: Sarah
Country: United States
State: Virginia
Metro: Charlottesville
Gender: Female
Interests: ranting about politics, going to protest, being with the people I love && meeting new ones. Going to hardcore/punk/whatever shows, and above all I adore going to Washington DC, even if i hate what it's about now, I'll always love that place
Expertise: confusing the hell out of people just to make them look stupid. writing a kick ass essay ten minutes before it's due. standing out in a crowd and embarassing all of my friends on purpose.
Message: message me
Website: visit my website
AIM:  FishinForNoodles
MSN: xemptypromisesx@msn.com
Yahoo:  antiflagchick08@yahoo.com
Member Since:
9/11/2004
|
|
| SO I haven't posted in a ver long time..
Why?
Well, because I've realised a lot of liberals are fake.
See, right before I stopped posting new things I starting hanging out with a guy named Jesse. Jesse is probably the most caring guy I've met in my life. He's one of my best friends and we'd do anything for each other. Plus, he and his wonderful girlfriend, Heather, have a set of baby girls on the way =)
Anyway, I mention all of this because he and I becoming friends ios the reason I figured out that most liberals contradict themselves. See, Jesse is a National Socialist; or as most people call them, White Supremisist Nazi Jerk. While I don't agree with his personal beliefs in the slightest, I really enojy talking to him about politics. He knows how to back his beliefs up with credible evidance and is very educated. Once Jesse and I started hanging out of a regular basis some of my left sided friends stopped talking to me. Why? Because I associate with someone who doesn't support race mixing, doesn't really care for people of certain religions and races and thinks the holucast was propoganda. Silly me! I always thought the left wing was about tolerance for people who have different beliefs! I guess I was wrong all along. See, I've come to realise that most people who call themselves liberals are actually very closed minded.
I've actually realised that I used to be that way. Just look at my user name! So I've decided to delete this xanga in a week and possibly make a new one.
Keep Hope Alive
| | |
|
Me: that bulletin your band posted trying to get neo-nazi's kicked off myspace was really stupid
Me: it's hypocritical to try to get someone kicked off for their views
velvetnegative: oh
Me: well, it is
velvetnegative: fuck
velvetnegative: i think if you dont do anything about it, you are just as bad as them
Me: they have a right to say it though
Me: free speech goes both ways
velvetnegative: i stand by what i have already said
Me: so as long as they're not trying to brainwash people, they have the right to be there
Me: i see what you're saying but you're going on your own beliefs and not law
velvetnegative: but they are trying to repress people
velvetnegative: well who said i was going by the law
Me: politics are based on law and just law
velvetnegative: who said it was politics?
Me: wow, you're being really hard headed
Me: i agree that they're repressing people and it's wrong
Me: but trying to get them silenced is a violation of the constitution and from as far as i know you, you're all for personal freedom
velvetnegative: i never said it was law abiding
velvetnegative: the kkk is legal but does that mean they have a right to lynch people?
velvetnegative: their views might be but their actions arent
Me: well having a myspace doesn't mean they're being active in the kkk or racist activities
velvetnegative: w/e
Me: what political ideology do you subscribe to?
velvetnegative7: liberterian
Me: and liberals believe in freedom of expression. right?
Me: and are against censorship
velvetnegative: yup
Me: and you don't think telling people they can't express themselves is censorship?
velvetnegative: jesus fucking christ
Me: you're being a complete asshole, byll
FishinForNoodles: i told you i see your point, you can at least try to see mine
velvetnegative: i see it
velvetnegative: but im not saying i agree with it
velvetnegative: and for some reason you find this remarkable
Me: because it's blatantly hypocritical and you can't see that
velvetnegative: i do
velvetnegative: but i dont give a fuck
Me: but if bush were to say something hypocritical, you'd be all over it
velvetnegative: yeah but theres mild hypocriticism and extreme
velvetnegative: bush saying killing is bad and than massacring thousands is a bit worse...
Me: but hypocrasy is bad either way
velvetnegative: yes
velvetnegative: and i said i was immoral
velvetnegative: but i dont give a fuck
What do you think? Is it hypocritical to say someone is a bad person for what they believe in and try to silence them?
I think I made my opinion pretty clear up there ^ | | |
| Does anyone know anything about legal emacipation?
It'd help me out a lot | | |
|
The Eight Stages of Genocide
Classification- Putting people into groups based on race, religion, interests, physical appearance ECT.
Symbolism- the assassination of a symbol or title with a classified group.
Dehumanization- one group denies humanity to the classified group in order to reason their actions of violence
Organization- done by government or terrorist groups to separate different members of the classified group or society in general
Polarization- to completely socially separate a group. (Us vs. Them mentality)
Preparation- organizing concentration camps, ghettos and death marches.
Extermination- The actual killing of an ENTIRE group of people
Denial- the covering up of genocide, making excuses or even blaming the terrorized group.
| | |
| After NSA wiretaps, can Googling be safe?
THE NEWS TRIBUNE
Published: January 22nd, 2006 02:30 AM
Naive Internet users sometimes think that they surf the Web in complete anonymity.
Think again. In the privacy policies their customers are supposed to read, such big search engines as Google and Yahoo! warn that individuals’ query histories may be turned over to law enforcement from time to time. The discovery process in civil lawsuits may also ferret out data on individual use of the Web.
Now it turns out that the Justice Department has subpoenaed the country’s leading search engines to acquire continent-sized dumps of information on how Americans are using the Internet. Google – the largest of them – has so far resisted the subpoena, but Yahoo!, the Microsoft Network and America Online have complied to a limited extent.
A close look at what the Justice Department is actually after doesn’t necessarily add up to Big Brother.
In the course of defending the Clinton-era Child Online Protection Act – which forbids online porn sites from allowing access to minors – the department is trying to develop an accurate picture of how people use the Internet. To do this, it asked the search engines for a random sampling of the Web site addresses in their indexes and aggregated information on all the search terms they handled in a specified period of time.
The Justice Department insists that it is seeking only general, anonymous information rather than anything that would identify what any particular individual was looking for on the Web. The subpoenaed companies more or less confirm this, though Google worries that the search terms themselves in some cases could identify the people making the searches.
Had these subpoenas come to light at some other time or under some other administration, they might have been less worrisome.
But as it happens, this news follows on the heels of revelations that the National Security Agency has been eavesdropping – without warrants – on suspected terrorist communications to and from people within the United States. Neither President Bush nor his Justice Department has shown the least evidence of understanding why the warrantless wiretapping of some Americans might be giving many other Americans the jitters.
With a White House so oblivious to privacy concerns, those jitters inevitably extend to subpoenas that might conceivably escalate into secret federal monitoring of individuals’ Internet use.
In this case, at least, the courts are in the loop and will presumably keep the Justice Department’s discovery from running amok. That’s what courts do – which is why they ought to be in the loop on the NSA intercepts as well.
xverge0fwakingx: do you get a newspaper?
FishinForNoodles: nope
xverge0fwakingx: ah damn.
FishinForNoodles: jobs?
xverge0fwakingx: theres an article in it about how the government is trying to have google monitored to see who is accessing pornographic images.
FishinForNoodles: LMAO
xverge0fwakingx: i thought so too.
xverge0fwakingx: google is resisting and probably going to court very soon.
FishinForNoodles: god, i hope this asshole gets impeached
xverge0fwakingx: i do too! i told my mom that..i was like "do we even still HAVE a constitution? why is it that clinton can get head from a secretary and get kicked out of office, but bush can turn this country into a piece of shit and still be in office?" | | |
|
